Search icon CANCEL
Subscription
0
Cart icon
Your Cart (0 item)
Close icon
You have no products in your basket yet
Save more on your purchases! discount-offer-chevron-icon
Savings automatically calculated. No voucher code required.
Arrow left icon
All Products
Best Sellers
New Releases
Books
Videos
Audiobooks
Learning Hub
Newsletter Hub
Free Learning
Arrow right icon
timer SALE ENDS IN
0 Days
:
00 Hours
:
00 Minutes
:
00 Seconds
Arrow up icon
GO TO TOP
Hands-On Domain-Driven Design with .NET Core

You're reading from   Hands-On Domain-Driven Design with .NET Core Tackling complexity in the heart of software by putting DDD principles into practice

Arrow left icon
Product type Paperback
Published in Apr 2019
Publisher Packt
ISBN-13 9781788834094
Length 446 pages
Edition 1st Edition
Languages
Tools
Concepts
Arrow right icon
Author (1):
Arrow left icon
Alexey Zimarev Alexey Zimarev
Author Profile Icon Alexey Zimarev
Alexey Zimarev
Arrow right icon
View More author details
Toc

Table of Contents (20) Chapters Close

Chapter 1. Why Domain-Driven Design

The software industry appeared back in the early 1960s and is growing ever since. We have heard predictions that someday all software would be written and we will not need more software developers, but this prophecy has never become a reality, and the growing army of software engineers is working hard to satisfy continually increasing demand.

However, from the very early days of the industry, the number of projects that were delivered very late and massively over budget, plus the number of failed projects is overwhelming. The 2015 CHAOS Report by Standish Group (https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/white-papers/chaos-report.pdf) suggests that from 2011 to 2015 the percentage of successful IT projects remains unchanged on a level of just 22%. Over 19% of all projects failed, and the rest have experienced challenges. These numbers are astonishing. Over four decades a lot of methods have been developed and advertised to be a silver bullet for software project management, but there is no or little change in the number of successful projects.

One of the critical factors that define the success of any IT project is understanding the problem, which the system to be designed, suppose to solve. We all very familiar with systems that do not solve problems they claim to answer or do it very inefficiently. Understanding the problem is also one of the core principles of the Lean Startup methodology, proposed by Eric Ries in his book The Lean Startup by Crown Publishing. Both Scrum and XP software development methodologies embrace interacting with users and understanding their problems.

Domain-Driven Design (DDD) term was coined by Eric Evans in his now-iconic book Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software by Addison-Wesley back in 2004. More than a decade after the book was published, interest in practices and principles, described in the book, started to grow exponentially. Many factors influence such growth in popularity, but most important one is that DDD explains how people from software industry can build an understanding of their users needs and create software systems, which solve the problem and make an impact.

In this chapter, we will discuss how understanding the business domain, building domain knowledge, and distinguishing essential complexity from accidental complexity, can help in creating software that matters.

The objective of this chapter is to understand:

  • Problem space versus solution space
  • What went wrong with requirements
  • Understanding complexity
  • The role of knowledge in software development
lock icon The rest of the chapter is locked
Register for a free Packt account to unlock a world of extra content!
A free Packt account unlocks extra newsletters, articles, discounted offers, and much more. Start advancing your knowledge today.
Unlock this book and the full library FREE for 7 days
Get unlimited access to 7000+ expert-authored eBooks and videos courses covering every tech area you can think of
Renews at $15.99/month. Cancel anytime
Visually different images